Thursday, December 21, 2006

The Royal empire is crumbling

The Royal empire is crumbling
PUDEMO President - Mario Masuku

“There is no night so long that it does not end with dawn”
(Ngugi Wa Thiongo)


Political Report presented on behalf of the National Executive Committee at the 6th National Congress of PUDEMO held on the 21-24th December, 2006

Contents

· Introduction

· After this landmark Congress, the history of Swaziland shall be written anew

· History will never forgive us for delaying the elimination of the tinkhundla crime against the Swazi people

· A brief diary of the watershed moments in the life of the Swazi people’s struggle for democracy

· After this Congress the history of Swaziland shall be written anew - How far are we to the promised land?

· We dare not lose our political bearings as we proceed on the road to a new and democratic Swaziland

· Organisational renewal and the introduction of a new culture of hard work, efficiency and selflessness are fundamental conditions for victory

· All cadres to the battlefront for a new and democratic Swaziland NOW!

Table of contents

1. Introduction

2. What is the meaning and essence of liberation in Swaziland – “The patriots who survived the bullets” and the bitterness of betrayal!

3. History will never forgive us for delaying the elimination of the tinkhundla crime against the Swazi people

4. A brief diary of the watershed moments in the life of the Swazi people’s struggle for democracy

5. After this historic Congress, the history of Swaziland shall be written anew – On the horizons of the promised land!

6. We dare not lose our political bearings as we proceed on the road to a new and democratic Swaziland

7. International solidarity is key – the essence of solidarity is in the practice

8. The ideological offensive against PUDEMO by the state and its media apparatus

9. Organisational renewal and the introduction of a new culture of hard work, efficiency, selflessness and advanced political clarity are fundamental conditions for victory
· What kind of PUDEMO can be considered organised and ready to lead the people of Swaziland into the promised land;

10. All cadres to the battlefront for a new and democratic Swaziland NOW!
- There is work to be done!

11. Priority tasks of PUDEMO at this stage

Members of the National Executive Committee of PUDEMO
The leadership of SWAYOCO and the Women’s league
Esteemed guests
Fraternal organizations and allies
Delegates and cadres of the fighting people’s movement,

Please receive on behalf of the oppressed and poor masses of our country in rural communities, urban slums and ghettoes, workplaces, schools and institutions of learning, sporting and professional organizations, traditional centres, churches and wherever they happen to be, as victims of a savage system imposed upon them by the royal family for years, revolutionary greetings and salutations to this esteemed gathering of freedom fighters on a mission to abolish a system rooted in naked greed, exploitation and oppression supervised by a tiny royal minority upon the mass of our people.

1. Introduction

In one of its major Congresses, FRELIMO adopted a Programme which said, “…………….we express our desire for a true and profound social transformation, based on a scientific analysis of reality, on defining the social base of the revolution and on the need to guarantee that the interests of the broad masses of the people prevail”.
Extract from a Programme adopted by the 5th FRELIMO Congress which ended on the 30th July, 1989 in Mozambique.

Interestingly for PUDEMO the key lessons derived from this historic Congress of the fighting Mozambican people’s movement was not just in the revolutionary content of the programme and declaration, but fundamentally in the extent of mass participation and thoroughness of the preparations towards that Congress. It indeed confirmed FRELIMO as the genuine representative of the oppressed and working people of that country in the way they themselves participated in determining the fate of Mozambique, their revolution and its people.

Pre-Congress discussions took place at grassroots level throughout the country. Party members, as well as the general population, participated in the discussion of the seven draft theses which formed the basis from which elected Congress delegates were to adopt guidelines for the country’s political, economic and social development for the coming five years.

This and other international experiences, including the process leading towards the Freedom Charter of the ANC-led liberation alliance in South Africa, are the kind of examples that are worth emulation in engaging not only PUDEMO members, but the mass of our people and allies in the attempt to development national consensus about the direction that the Swazi struggle must take, as well as the pace at which it must move.

This proud tradition has found full expression in the participatory mode that has characterized the development of the Road map to a new and democratic Swaziland, which has been placed before this Congress by the structures of the movement at all levels and has also embraced the enriching inputs of our allies and people beyond the immediate family of PUDEMO associates. This document is built upon the historic programmes of the movement, amongst them; the Last mile to freedom (Ulibambe Lingashoni), Hlominsika, Umkhombandlela (the Strategic Route), Building a people’s movement rooted in the concrete conditions of Swazi society and our broad guide, the Strategy and tactics. It is a consolidated expression of these profound documents in the way it outlines the tasks of the revolution in the current phase, whilst at the same time, it is a systematic projection into the phase of struggle beyond tinkhundla, where the challenges of development and confronting poverty shall be more naked than ever before in our schedule of tasks.

Therefore, the delegates gathered in this house have a clear and definite task before them. That task is about engaging, intensively and with the deepest passion and absolute clarity, the proposals before us, in order to answer the question, what should be done to advance speedily towards a new and democratic Swaziland. With the successful and proper completion of that task, we can proudly proclaim that this Congress would have done justice to the huge expectations and aspirations of the oppressed people of Swaziland and our dearest friends all over the world, who look to us with hope and a sense of confidence in our ability to integrate Swaziland into the world community of democracy-loving people, as soon as possible.

You will all agree with me comrades that such a task is never an easy one, with all the eyes of the world upon us. But we dare not let down our people. By joining PUDEMO, we have taken an oath to do all within our power to liquidate the monster of royal savagery called tinkhundla, and it is during such times that we are called upon to revisit the essence of that oath and our sense of urgency in executing the tasks of the revolution and in proving our unwavering dedication to the people.

2. What is the meaning and essence of liberation in Swaziland –
“The patriots who survived the bullets” and the bitterness of betrayal!

I have chosen the following illustration from the writings of Ngugi Wa Thiongo to clarify a point about the possibility of the sweet fruits of liberation turning sour, unless the masses are organized to exercise all-round vigilance against the dangers of thieves, who do not work for political change and victory, but always steal the victories of others (the poor and oppressed in this case), who had to suffer and sweat for this victory. This will assist us clarify what our expectations and challenges are in the course of advancing our struggle.

Ngugi Wa Thiongo in his wonderful work of magnificent artistry, rooted in the oral traditions of Africa, Matigari, displays in the most succinct terms what is the definite challenge faced by liberation movements, PUDEMO in particular.

Matigari ma Njiruungi (the patriots who survived the bullets) returns from the liberation struggle after finally destroying his enemies, the white settler Williams and his puppet and collaborator, John Boy, to claim his rights in his independent country. He buries his arms and goes back home to enjoy peace and fulfillment at last. To his astonishment he finds that, in spite of certain superficial changes (black faces where previously there would have been only white, for example) the world is still upside down and justice still elusive as ever. As before;

“the builder sleeps in the open
The worker is left empty-handed
The tailor goes naked
The tiller goes to sleep on an empty stomach
Wealth and power still reside in the hands of a few who abuse it to terrorise and dispossess the people. Matigari, who built the settler’s house, now claims it as his own. But far from being welcomed as a triumphant hero, he is insulted and beaten, arrested and labeled “thief”.

The children of the very men Matigari has spent his life fighting have inherited their places in the power structure. The son of Matigari’s old enemy, settler Williams, now represents the interests of various international financial and commercial organizations whose names as acronyms spell out in the Gikuyu language “the real thieves”.

The son of John Boy, educated at the expense of the whole community who had sent him abroad “singing with pride: he shall come back and clean up our cities, our country and deliver us from slavery”, has indeed returned – as a corrupt and cynical comprador tycoon. The finishing touches to his education have been obtained at Fort hare in South Africa and at the London School of Economics. He has learnt to scorn the values expressed in Matigari’s song of the liberation struggle;

“Great love I saw there
Among the women and children
We shared even
The single bean
That fell upon the ground”
and has substituted his own individualistic philosophy”

“Go your way and let me go mine
For none of us is carrying the other”

We are constantly reminded of the direct relevance of the neo-colonial experience depicted symbolically through the characters in the book by direct pointers like the question unfortunately so apt in many post-colonial countries: “Who in this country does not know John Boy?”, as well as by the introduction which tells us, “Reader/listener: may the story take place in the country of your choice!”

In the true spirit of the challenge posed upon the reader or us, to be more precise, we have chosen Swaziland to depict the story with due consideration of the specific and unique realities on the ground.

The Road map has posed an interesting analysis in response to the question posed by Ngugi, “Who in this country does not know John Boy?”, the collaborator and puppet of the white settler master. It could not be anyone than the monarchy, that proclaims itself the custodian of all that is Swazi and the very essence of our being and identity, yet it works tirelessly to sustain and perpetuate the conditions of neo-colonialism through savage exploitation f the poor in the holy name of Swazi culture. In doing so, it is intertwined in the accumulation scheme that is spearheaded by what Ngugi calls the “corrupt and cynical comprador tycoon”.

This is very important to understand and engage these issues free from narrow face-value viewpoints and generalisations, but from a profound revolutionary standpoint of seeking to explain the position and role of the Swazi monarchy in the broad accumulation process and power structure (political architecture) in the country.

Therefore, the Road map makes an important and fundamental point when it says, “that is why the national democratic transformation struggle can only be meaningful if it is a revolutionary struggle. This means, it must be a profound process of change in which power relations are radically transformed”. In this sense, there should be a remarkable difference between revolutionary sounding slogans and phrases and actual revolutionary content, in theory and practice.

3. History will never forgive us for delaying the elimination of the tinkhundla crime against the Swazi people

For sometime now, PUDEMO has pointed to the burgeoning crisis within the tinkhundla system. The chain of events which have begun to unfold provokes questions as to whether we have fully grasped the depth of that crisis and the extent to which it has traumatized and made useless those who occupy the commanding heights in the system we seek to destroy.

Such crisis do not originate in the personality traits of individual political leaders, although they also form a key part of this.

We learn nothing about the real nature of the crisis currently afflicting tinkhundla by noting ONLY that Mswati as a person plunders Swazi wealth and invests it overseas, abuse women and treats us all as slaves, therefore if he were to stop it the system would be fine or if he were to be removed, the crisis would end. The crisis are systemic and deeply rooted in the rotten foundations of tinkhundla semi-feudalism and neo-colonialism, in which he is, of course, a part.

Personalities, no doubt represent the public face of the crisis and the corrupt system, but they come and go, but the crisis remain, ever deepening. So, what is the solution, what is the place of monarchy in the whole system and what is the place of the individual occupying the position of the monarchy in that regard, and finally, how do they, together, relate to the system in general and what is the system, anyway?

This therefore, brings us to the second and related question, what is tinkhundla and how do we hope to eliminate the system of tinkhundla. Understanding a system is important, because it regulates and determines the behaviour of all who are part of it and unless it is arrogantly changed, it forever structures social relations and patterns of life in society. It determines who gets what power and how can he/she use it.

A system decides the limits within which every act can be carried out, it sets the parameters of what must and must not be done. Therefore, it prescribes what the monarchy should do and should not do, without saying the monarchy is a pitiful object of a system imposed from above, he is very much a part of it and benefits from it, which explains why it is in his best interest for the system to survive. But what must be noted even more deeper, is the fact that the monarchy acts as part of a group of classes and forces collectively advancing their material interests as regard the structure of wealth accumulation and control.

Before us is the task of determining what should be done to speed up the process of eliminating tinkhundla savagery. There are two key contradictions in Swaziland that reinforce each other; class and gender inequalities. They also interface with a whole lot of related contradictions, such as race, which though subordinate, but are critical in the definition of power relations in the country.

The elimination of a system of oppression is determined not only by will, but primarily by the capacity of the forces advancing the revolution to act decisively, taking advantage of the mood of the masses and the momentum or political tempo generated by the work done amongst the masses, to drive a serious political blow against the structures of the system.

We are certain tinkhundla is crumbling, but what we still need to be more certain about is the actual date of its demise.

We offer no apology that our being here today is to plan how best and immediate can we bury this royal demon, once and for all. Our people are impatient and they are justified in being so. They are fed up with sloganeering, bankrupt political posturing and weak action that does not bring about change.

We must therefore, assist clarify how best can we deal with all these problems in order to advance as soon as possible to a new and democratic Swaziland. People will not join or support PUDEMO merely because it has nice colours and revolutionary sounding slogans, neither will they join it because they hate tinkhundla, but fundamentally, they will join PUDEMO because indeed it is a viable alternative, ready and capable of taking forward their ideals and aspirations.

It is imperative that we work as revolutionary plotters, daily engaged in a bitter struggle to bring down the system. In doing so, we must resist the temptation to oversimplify the problem or undermine the strength of the tinkhundla system.

4. A brief diary of the watershed moments in the life of the Swazi people’s struggle for democracy

The Swazi people’s struggle for democracy and profound social transformation has undergone several stages and has passed through several difficult moments that have been critical to its development and strategic orientation.

However, notably, the following have been the most defining watershed moments in the life of our struggle;

  • The peasants resistance to the invasion of colonialists and struggle against land dispossession by a combination of the royalists and their colonial patrons

  • The workers and people’s resistance to British colonialism and its ultimate betrayal by the monarchy and its comprador allies, that led to the proclamation of the 1973 king’s decree which bans political parties and denied the people all their rights, thus entrenching the supremacy of the royal family and their allies

  • The emergence of a new era of sustained political resistance with the birth of PUDEMO in 1983 which inspired a wave of mass and popular forces throughout the country and forced to the regime to introduce some reforms, such as the royal constitution and the series of vuselas.

The common thread that runs through all these periods is that the people are central to every struggle and only them can defend their interests fully, because the reality is that without the constant vigilance of the people, their interests are bound to be subdued by the greed of one elite or the other.

There is real danger that if the people remain spectators in the course of the on-going struggle, a new elite will step forward and claim the victories of the masses and turn it into a new offensive against the people; demobilizing popular forces, deploying reactionary ideas against revolutionary activities, perpetuating elitist accumulation processes and even collaborating with the forces of semi-feudal and neo-colonial reaction against the oppressed, to sustain their newly acquired privileges.

We always refer to these different periods and stages in the course of the development of the Swazi struggle in order to draw useful lessons for the on-going struggle. Each period offers rich lessons for us, as long as we are willing to learn and also reflect on these. But even more fundamental is the task of relating these to the concrete experiences and conditions of Swazi society today. In doing so, we shall be correctly affirming the Sikhawini call to build a movement rooted in the concrete conditions of Swazi society.

5. After this historic Congress, the history of Swaziland shall be written anew – On the horizons of the promised land!

In 2004 we set ourselves the task of ensuring that the next elections in 2008 shall be held in a democratic Swaziland, which means we declared that never again shall national elections be held under tinkhundla. This means, we must work hard to ensure that this is realized in practice.

However, 2008 is not the year we should focus our energies on, but we must go beyond that to develop a vision or plan that goes far beyond that to act as our prime guide towards the fundamental resolution of the problems we face in our society today. These days, only those who plan properly and plan ahead are able to storm the dangerous weathers of political leadership over social change. We need to clarify the issue of time-frames as called upon by the Road Map, because only then can we monitor progress in our work.

We must begin to grapple in more real terms with the reality that our people want more than the promise of a democratic society in general, but fundamentally, they want to know what is entailed by that promise, what does it mean for the landless rural masses, what does it mean for the exploited workers, what does it mean for the women suffering from daily abuse and inequalities, what does it mean for the unemployed and starving and what does it mean for those who cannot access education and health.

This is what we must begin to engage it in more real terms, without the dangerous over-generalizations of the moment. People are asking concrete questions and we are expected to give concrete answers or else we shall face the wrath of a people fed up with words, but wanting concrete issues about their lives.

This 6th General Congress, therefore, is that forum. It is an assembly of the most determined and resolute amongst our people, seeking to give concrete answers to concrete questions. We are not here to be general, but we are here to call things by their names. We are here to clarify what we refer to when we talk about freedom, we are here to clarify what we mean by freedom poverty, we are here to explain more clearly what we mean by the idea of, “the emancipation of the people is an act of the people themselves”.

By the end of this Congress, we should have answered the many questions our people ask us on a daily basis. We know these questions better, because we live in communities and relate to the people on a regular basis. Central to our task is the issue of clear mechanisms for the implementation of our programmes, an area we have had a serious deficiency in during the past few days. It must be clear what should be done, by who and when, as well as how will we assess and monitor progress at regular intervals.

6. We dare not lose our political bearings as we proceed on the road to a new and democratic Swaziland

Being an activist does not necessarily make you progressive, though it’s the fundamental condition for liberation. This means, at all times, we must assess the extent to which we are still on course as regards the direction towards a progressive destination, even in our daily activism, which should be progressive.

On many occasions we have faced the challenge of being actively involved in struggle, without losing our firm principles as revolutionaries. This means we seek to remain consistent in our revolutionary principles as cadres of the movement, whatever the temptations to drift away from our key political bearings, owing to the pressure of the forces at play and power of reactionary forces.

Central to our being on firm on sticking to our political bearings is the question of ideology. This is where we need more than just clarity, but absolute clarity on what we want, whose interests do we represent, what relations exist between those we represent and everyone else, and finally, how do we stick to the interests of those we represent even under conditions of extreme pressure from forces hostile to our agenda and vested powerful interests.

The acid test for any movement’s honesty and absolute dedication to the poor or its prime constituency is its ability to stick religiously to their interests and not betray them even when powerful interests threaten to disrupt the thorough-going process of fundamental change.

There is no revolutionary action without revolutionary ideas, in the words of one advanced thinker of revolutionary theory. No cadre can claim to be advancing revolution when he is not guided by revolutionary ideas and that is what must be said openly and without fear by all of us. This means, the task of deepening revolutionary consciousness is central and pivotal to PUDEMO’s future outlook and direction, as to determine its political orientation in general. No cadre must be allowed to be a member of the movement without having undergone the process of thorough ideological transformation in order to be equipped to meet the challenges of the new society we are striving to build.

According to the renewal plan of PUDEMO, we must ensure that all cadres of PUDEMO have received induction and are regularly exposed to deep ideological and political education to transform their consciousness and upgrade their level of understanding and interpretation of complex matters, in the simplest way possible to ordinary people.

There is a dangerous tendency to assume that ideology means indoctrination. Ideology means a systematic guide that underpins your approach to issues. It assists you explain things in a particular way and is a base of reference for difficult and confusing questions.

At times personal interests begin to define our approach to various issues, which is a real danger and must be fought against at all times, so that the movement has its own distinct identity ideologically and otherwise and must not be clouded with individual opinions and interests. It must at all times, maintain a particular political profile of its own. This is the only way we can ensure uniformity in the views and policies of our movement, particularly as regards how they are projected in public.

However, this must not be interpreted to mean the elimination of diversity in our ranks, but it should mean the intensification of pluralistic ideas, which should be free to express themselves, but also be cohesive enough to harmonise all these into a movement view that unites and around which everyone can feel comfortable, without sacrificing principles on the alter of diversity.

We must not encourage the simplicity with which comrades do things currently, where some members of the movement can choose to associate with problematic elements in our society, out of populism, at the expense of our fundamental principles. This is a recipe for social disaster and political opportunism.

7. International solidarity is key – the essence of solidarity is in the practice

By international solidarity we mean the deliberate and conscious effort to raise the capacity of the forces fighting for social justice and human dignity, to the level required to defeat decisively the forces of reaction, underdevelopment and oppression wherever they are to be found.

In this sense, effective solidarity means more than just the moral obligation to “feel pity or sympathise with the oppressed”, but it is a deliberate act of involvement in the most noble struggle to broaden the frontiers of human progress everywhere. This can only be possible through the liquidation of the forces of counter-revolution, which are as stubborn as are the determined forces of progress to crush them. This creates a particular scenario in the balance of power globally and requires decisiveness to change them towards the struggling and oppressed people of the world. In one word, it requires maximum unity and determination by the people of the world.

The advantage of revolutionary forces in this regard, is that they are rooted in and guided by scientific tools of analysis as imposed by our understanding of the obtaining conditions. This provides us with the following facts;

· It is scientifically determined that society is objectively moving forward, not in a straight line though, as set-backs abound
· That the struggle for freedom and dignity is, for humanity, a struggle to survive and therefore, a basic condition of the very existence of the species itself

With this basis truth on our side, we are assured of victory, but this does not mean complacence or pre-determined victories, but even more determination to struggle and act together to make this happen. We can never take for granted the neck-breaking resistance by the forces of counter-revolution.

Solidarity is not narrowly about, “giving Swazis to fight their own struggle”, same to the Saharawis, Palestinians, Cubans, Burmese, etc to fight their own struggle, but fundamentally it becomes part of our own struggle and its continuation as South Africans, as Namibians, as Europeans, as Canadians, as Soviets, etc. It becomes a central part of what “we”, as South Africans (in the case of South Africa), have always been and continue to fight for, human dignity and freedom for all. It completes the mission of seeking to abolish all conditions that give birth to injustice anywhere and in the process, widens the frontiers favourable to the intensified prosecution of the revolution for its logical conclusion.

This however, should not be simplistically taken to mean that, we say South Africans should fight on behalf of Swazis, Palestinians, etc, but it means in supporting the struggles of the Swazi people, they regard it as their own and are prepared to all and everything to ensure victory, because their own future is tied to the victory of the Swazi people.

It is in this context that we seek to once again, not as a matter of formality, to extend our sincerest appreciation to our allies and compatriots who have refused to be intimidated by the tinkhundla regime and its international friends into dissociating themselves from our cause. They have stubbornly intensified their active participation in the cause of the Swazi people as if it was theirs.

In this instance, we are mindful of the glorious work done by our comrades in Denmark of the Southern Africa Contact, a former anti-apartheid movement under the leadership of Patrick, McManus, Morten Nielsen and Lilian Andressen, the former anti-apartheid movement of Netherlands under the leadership of Fons Geerlings, as well as NIZA and XminusY, the Canada-based Swaziland Solidarity Network under the leadership of Teresa Debly, the British-based ACTSA and all our friends all over the world, including ENIASA, which is a Europe wide former anti-apartheid network. We salute these friends of our people and commit ourselves to ensuring that their good intentions in supporting our case are not let down.

We pay special tribute to our comrades and compatriots in South Africa, who have afforded us all they can to see the cause of peace and democracy triumph in Swaziland for the benefit of the rest of the continent’s people. They support unconditionally the conviction of the African people that the time for despots in Africa is over, the time for man-made hunger and starvation is over, the time for the rampant abuse of women in the holy name of African culture is over and the time for the limitless plunder of Africa’s resources for the benefit of greedy elites is over.

In this regard, we once again, expressed our profound appreciations to the ruling alliance of South Africa, comprised of the ANC, SACP and COSATU and their leagues, as well as the whole MDM formation. We appreciate the outstanding work of these comrades in support of our efforts for democracy in Swaziland. The recent and highly successful border blockade organized by the Swaziland Solidarity Network under the leadership of Solly Mapaila together with COSATU and supported by the SACP, YCL, ANCYL and other components of the MDM send a strong message to the Swazi regime and shook the foundations of royal tyranny. This led to intensified attacks particularly against COSATU by the Swazi regime and some opportunists within the ranks of the trade union movement of Swaziland, seeking to please the monarchy and win recognition at the table of royal privilege.

However, the mass of the working people of Swaziland supported this blockade unconditionally, because liberation for them is not some academic and political posture for narrow opportunistic ends, but a reality of life that their suffering is unbearable and day more is unacceptable, worst still an academic debate about the life and death action against tyranny.

We salute COSATU for standing firm to that end and exposing the dangers we face of sheer opportunism in our ranks sometimes, which must be confronted directly. However, we are seeking to do more to unite the poor and struggling masses, because only the royal fascists benefit from divisions and that is why our Road map programme points to the urgency of a national democratic front.

We must initiate an open and honest debate with all our comrades in the ranks of the democratic forces here in Swaziland about what we see as the most appropriate approach that the democratic struggle must take to avoid the confusion as perpetuated by the enemy.

8. The ideological offensive against PUDEMO by the state and its media apparatus

We continue to note that the state has intensified its strategy of seeking to criminalise PUDEMO and demonise its legitimate and noble activities as acts of banditry. In the true spirit of STRATCOM in apartheid South Africa, the Swazi media has taken upon itself to be the frontrunner in this campaign, acting on behalf of its master and sending shockwaves and fear throughout Swazi society of an impending PUDEMO savagery against the people.

The strategy of the regime is very clear, to create fertile conditions for the intensification of brutality against PUDEMO on a mass scale, as we have seen recently. This means, we need to exercise all-round vigilance against the plan of the regime and its friends in the hostile underworld of mercenaries. We continue to warn that the regime is amassing weapons on a scale never heard off before, creating a huge network of secret squads, some disguised as traditional regiments, yet are auxiliaries of the state.

In this war, the regime has, to its aid some journalists from the old thinking in South Africa, whose attitude to our struggle is informed by their allegiance to apartheid gutter journalism, who, in the name of journalism are acting as political agents of certain agendas and creating fictitious stories to suit their narrow pre-conceived agendas. They are fed by the system from its network of misinformation and disinformation, systematically targeted at PUDEMO and SWAYOCO.

The recent false creation of an underground army, which has been exposed as a disgraced and failed plot of the system working with is friends in and outside the country, to create a state of siege for the masses, is an example of how desperate the enemy is and how dangerous it has become. We must be on the alert as more and more of such false creations are in the pipeline, judging by the look of things now.

We must be ready to engage the enemy in his territory, where he enjoys absolute monopoly over powerful institutions that shape public opinion and close every little space for reactionary ideas, and in the process, we shall be widening the frontiers of progressive ideas in our society.

Every member of PUDEMO must be ready for an all-out ideological offensive in defence of revolutionary ideas, in churches, schools, workplaces, communities, social centers and everywhere, we must be firm in fighting against the ideas of the ruling class and exposing opportunism. PUDEMO’s ideas of hope and change must be the dominant currency in our society, all people must be afforded the opportunity to share and benefit from these good news. The news of liberation must reach out to every corner of Swazi society and leave no stone unturned, even in the most conservative parts of our society, the goods news must filter through. We must intensify our ideological offensive to liberate the minds of the people and inspire confidence in their ability to fight for their liberation and dignity.

We must also be on the alert about the dangerous opportunism of Sibahle Sinje, a state creation to confuse the people. These agents of conservatism and tinkhundla poisonous ideas, have all of a sudden become the self-appointed champions of democracy, yet we know their real colours. Not long ago, they mobilized traditional regiments against the democratic movements, in the most violent fashion, though they did not succeed, but their intentions were very dangerous and they sowed seeds of hatred for democracy and change in the minds of traditionalists, yet today, they have not gone back to those people they misled to apologise for their self-serving narrow agenda against the country’s future and people.

9. Organisational renewal - A new culture of hard work, efficiency, selflessness and advanced political clarity are fundamental conditions for victory

The basic question that every Swazi is asking is, after tinkhundla is gone what is next? Who is the viable alternative, so that we can all rally around as the reliable custodian of our aspirations and hopes as a nation? Since its birth 20 years ago, PUDEMO has always given one answer to this question, and that answer is; “we are the alternative and we are ready to deliver on your hopes and aspirations”.

The Piet Retief decision about an Organisational Renewal Plan (Imvuselelo Plan) of PUDEMO which was adopted in 2003 is long overdue. We need to ask ourselves how far have we gone in its implementation.

PUDEMO has consistently worked to convince the ordinary Swazi that his/her political insurance is nowhere else other than in the movement that braved the situation when no one else could dare rear his head.

Indeed, the people of Swaziland raised their heads to see if what is portrayed is really true, guess what! Confusing signals were sent. At times a glimmer of hope would really send the people on the streets rallying around their historical leader, PUDEMO, whilst at times, their leader either retreated, backtracked, disappeared or went back and forth, without a sense of clear political purpose. This is the message that the ordinary Swazi has of PUDEMO. Luckily for PUDEMO, the mass of the people have not totally forsaken their movement, they still hope it will emerge as the leader that it should be, even at this late hour when the crisis of the regime have deepened to levels where the ordinary people can no longer afford to wait for the sleeping giant to awaken, they still are waiting.

Therefore, the time is now and no words can clearly express this than the Ermelo Declaration of PUDEMO, which said, “30 years of royal slavery is enough, the time for decisive action is NOW”. This sense of urgency and seriousness must be instilled into the hearts and minds of PUDEMO cadres as they go about their daily tasks. Casual political work and part-time political schedules have failed to live up to the expectations of these masses.

We must not take for granted the patience and confidence of these masses in PUDEMO and think it is given, that the masses will forever wait for PUDEMO to move at its snail pace or enjoy its political holiday while basking in the glory of being the “political pioneer of the Swazi struggle”, with unequalled political experience.

The movement has problems which have gone beyond being internal matters, but they are now public matters. Some of these most pressing problems include;

  • Weak or none existent structures and campaigns, particularly in regions and branches as they are there in name or individuals;

  • Poor communication within our own structures, first, and with the mass of the people, generally.

  • Poor co-ordination and coherence by higher structures, particularly the NEC and regions which are key power centres in the political language of PUDEMO;

  • Weak cadreship in terms of; theoretical clarity and understanding of key issues, as well as in terms of frontline militancy and active participation and leadership in the daily struggles of these masses

  • Poor profiling of PUDEMO leadership, which makes the masses have less confidence in the movement itself, because people should associate the movement with a particular symbol of resistance and hope.

  • Inability of PUDEMO to correctly take up and rally the masses around issues of daily concern to them and their lives, such that we are walking parallel to the struggles of these masses, though we claim to lead them.

Therefore, if we are serious about reclaiming our historical position as the leader of these masses, the above picture must be removed immediately. We must work tirelessly to change the outlook and political posture of the movement to reflect seriousness, urgency and undying commitment, underpinned by unity of purpose and superior methods of organisation in actual struggles.

Organising PUDEMO into a superior political force guided by advanced political theory and sophisticated methods of organisation on the ground is the real motive behind this plan. It requires the following qualities, in order to succeed;

  • Willingness on the part of all members and leaders of PUDEMO to admit that the situation within the movement has reached a crisis point;

  • The luxury of casualty is not in the interest of the movement and the suffering masses, hence urgency must be the driving force behind this plan and the whole effort to renew PUDEMO;

  • As leaders at all levels, including regions, branches and leagues, we must not be defensive, but upfront about our weaknesses and failures so that we can begin the process of correcting them and improving our work;

  • We must allow for honest debates and reflection amongst ourselves, our allies and general structures of our society;

  • Frank and vigorous political debates must form the central part of our organisational culture, which requires that we encourage it and not stifle it as has been the culture in some of our structures, particularly in regions where forums for discussions have not been so pronounced;

  • Sacrifice is the only guarantee for victory in any revolution, which therefore requires that cadres stop lamenting, but put all their energies at the disposal of the struggle and work for these masses tirelessly. We cannot have both worlds of comfort and normality living side by side with political struggle, because struggle by its very being presupposes sacrifice and abnormality in one’s way of life;

  • Finally, We must identify and uproot all elements that hinder progress and frustrate this plan, which is about the future of our movement and the people it represents. We must be upfront about the need for this plan to succeed at all costs.

PUDEMO has two choices; fail in positioning itself properly and regret forever or timeously make a difference and reposition itself properly and remain relevant for years to come.

What kind of PUDEMO can be considered organised and ready to lead the people of Swaziland into the promised land;

  • Fully functional structures; holding regular meetings, reporting constantly to members, carrying out tasks efficiently, uniting the people, etc;

  • All cadres fully mobilised and in action. The attitude of people who are militants only in conferences or in social gatherings, without daily active participation in political work is failing the movement and must be defeated;

  • All structures carrying out political work amongst the masses and organising popular campaigns around issues affecting the poor in their communities;

  • Political education, propaganda work and building strong regions and branches is central to the future of PUDEMO and must be carried out daily by every member of PUDEMO;

  • Guaranteeing the full and effective participation of women, disabled people, rural poor, youth, workers and all elements of the marginalised community of our country, in the daily affairs of PUDEMO

  • Clear documents, internalised and fully understood by the whole membership, so as to spread PUDEMO hegemony throughout all sectors of our society is a condition for victory;

Leadership guided by the motto; first in commitment, first in sacrifice and first in discipline at all levels; NEC, RECs and BECs;

10. All cadres to the battlefront for a new and democratic Swaziland NOW! – There is work to be done!

The development of revolutionary class consciousness among the broad masses is possible only if they accumulate experiences of struggles that are not only limited to the winning of partial demands within the framework of tinkhundla aristocracy. The gradual injection of these demands into mass struggles can come about only through the efforts of a broad layer of advanced workers who are closely linked to the masses and who distribute and popularise these demands.

Our understanding of the concept of organisation explains the relationship between the masses, the organized sections of society and the whole movement led by PUDEMO. It clarifies the process by which revolutionary consciousness is developed, ultimately explaining the role of SWAYOCO in that process. Because we are waging a struggle under conditions which are not of our own choosing, we are very much conscious of the fact that the ruling ideas in society are the ideas of the tinkhundla regime. This requires intensified and all -round propaganda offensive.

The more the stability of the existing society is brought into question, and the more the class struggle intensifies, and the more the class rule of the exploiters itself begins to waver in practice, the more will at least sections of the oppressed class begin to free themselves from the control of the ideas of the ruling system.

Alongside the struggle for social change, a struggle goes on between the ideology of the oppressors and the new ideas of the revolutionary class. But it is only in the cause of concrete struggles that the majority of the oppressed can liberate themselves from the ideology of oppression. For this control is exerted not only, nor even primarily, through purely ideological manipulation and the mass assimilation of the ruling class ideological production, but the above all through the actual day-to-day workings of the existing economy and society and their effect on the consciousness of the oppressed.

What distinguishes the revolutionary vanguard from this mass is the fact that even during a lull in the struggle it does not abandon the front lines of the class struggle, but continues the war. It thus helps give form to a factor of continuity, as opposed to the necessarily discontinuous action of the mass, and to a factor of consciousness, as opposed to the spontaneity of the mass movement, in and of itself. However, advanced workers are driven to continuous organisation and growing class consciousness less by theory, science, or an intellectual grasp of the social whole than by the practical knowledge acquired in struggle.

We must recognize that most of the mass is active only during the struggle, after the struggle it will sooner or later retreat into private life, i.e. into the struggle for existence.

The possibility of a successful take over of power arises when a merging of actions by the vanguard and the masses with the consciousness of the vanguard and revolutionary layers has been accomplished. For the broad masses, the elementary class struggle arising from the contradictions of the capitalist system is always kindled only by matters of immediate concern. PUDEMO must make all progressive demands and movements of all oppressed social layers and classes its own.

Experience in struggle is by no means sufficient for clarity on the tasks of a broad revolutionary, mass struggle to be attained. Not only, of course are these tasks connected to the immediate motives that set part of the struggle, but they can be grasped only by means of a clear understanding of the overall social development. Without protracted and consistent preparation, without the education of many advanced cadres in the spirit of a revolutionary programme, and without the practical experience accumulated over the years by these advanced cadres through attempting to bring this programme to the broad masses, it would be absolutely illusory to assume that suddenly, with the mere aid of mass actions, a consciousness equal to the demands of the historical situation could be created among these broad masses.

Without the experience of revolutionary struggle by the broad masses, there can be no revolutionary consciousness among these masses.

There could be no better way to clarify and illustrate the tasks of PUDEMO and all its cadres than the way the Road Map document has captured them. Essentially, this means that we have a task ahead and that task is primarily about implementing the resolutions of this Congress and whatever programme we come out with from this historic gathering.

I do not wish to repeat what it has guided us towards, but wants to capture the heart of what is says as regards the direction and pace of the Swazi struggle and what PUDEMO is required to do in that pursuit. It outlines a number of critical tasks, whose implementation shall constitute a decisive advance for the Swazi people’s struggle.

Most importantly, there are three critical areas of primary engagement that the movement’s capacity must clearly be sharpened even more for the battles ahead;

  • Capacity for political struggle – The battle to take over state power and use it to transform society in the interests of a better organized Swaziland that guarantees long-term stability and development for all

  • Capacity for ideological struggle – fight and win the battle of ideas, convince the people about the need for change and build popular consciousness at all levels of our society

  • Capacity for economic struggle – challenge economic injustices to organize the people around their most basic needs in order to build working class power against royal exploitation and despotism

The core functions of every structure of the PUDEMO, wherever it is to be found are the three inter-related tasks, which constitute the daily bread for any cadre of the movement;
  • Political education to develop quality cadres and leaders of the movement and the struggle as a whole

  • Propaganda and agitation to build revolutionary consciousness and critical thinking for radical action

  • Organising the people into structures of mass resistance (building strong organization) for sustained mass struggle

Priority tasks of PUDEMO at this stage:

Convening an urgent Road Map Implementation Indaba to develop an Operational Plan to take forward the programme, particularly to deal in detail with the following tasks;

      • Creation of structures to facilitate and sustain implementation of the programme
      • Mechanism to popularize the Programme to all sectors of Swazi society and internationally
      • Deployment of cadres to various sites of struggle and develop accountability mechanisms to that effect
      • Identifying all possible sources of financial, human and material support and setting clear targets
      • Set targets for identified tasks; Recruitment, organizational renewal & development of a pool of cadres

    • Convene a National Political School of PUDEMO to bring together all cadres of the movement deployed in various sites of struggle to engage and clarify fundamental political issues relating to the direction, content and character of the Swazi revolution, so as to deepen our key strategic priority focus, which will enhance a deeper understanding of this plan and how best it can be implemented on the ground, towards a common objective and in unison.

    • Creating the necessary political infrastructure for sustained political education, propaganda and campaigns work, as well as to build a national democratic front of all progressive forces around the minimum programme for a new and democratic constitution for Swaziland, leading to democratic elections for the country

    • Establish a Commission on International Affairs to develop a framework for international solidarity mobilisation and a foreign policy document of PUDEMO

A Special Commission on Democratic Governance and Social Transformation shall be established during the Road Map Implementation Indaba to ensure that a clear programme and specific policies on the various spheres of governance are developed. In September, 2007, the NEC should then convene a Special Conference on democratic governance and social transformation in Swaziland to present the final product, which shall constitute a PUDEMO framework for governance.

Conclusion


What distinguishes the revolutionary vanguard from this mass is the fact that even during a lull in the struggle it does not abandon the front lines of the class struggle, but continues the struggle. It thus helps give form to a factor of continuity, as opposed to the necessarily discontinuous action of the mass, and to a factor of consciousness, as opposed to the spontaneity of the mass movement, in and of itself. However, advanced workers are driven to continuous organisation and growing class consciousness less by theory, science, or an intellectual grasp of the social whole than by the practical knowledge acquired in struggle.

This is why we say, we are now in the era of sustained liberation struggle rather than spontaneous occurrences of instant anger without clear political motive. We do whatever we do out of a conscious plan and not as an accident of history.

Amandla!!

Tuesday, December 5, 2006

Waiting for the apocalypse (umgicomgico): political violence and loathing in Swaziland

Waiting for the apocalypse (umgicomgico): political violence and loathing in Swaziland

The People's United Democratic Movement
PUDEMO of Swaziland
Date: December 5, 2006

E-mail: pudemo@yahoo.co.uk


Violence and political intolerance have long been the central policy of the absolute monarch government. This policy dates back to the fateful day of April 12, 1973 when the late King Sobhuza II proclaimed his intention of eliminating dissenting political voices. For more than thirty years, the monarchy government has aggressively pursued this policy to persecute generations of pro-democracy activists through the use of direct violence and fear. We understand that in Swaziland as in other evil dictatorships, the use of violence and torture against one person is meant to silence not only that person but the whole population

A week after the South African newspaper, The Saturday Star (25/11/06), published a fake story about a PUDEMO secret army, King Mswati III unleashed a pre-Christmas violence campaign against PUDEMO and SWAYOCO. In our recent publication, we warned that the story, which generated excitement at the prospect of an imminent umgicomgico among local journalists, will be followed by massive state violence against our people.

On Saturday December 2, 2006, armed police attacked PUDEMO and SWAYOCO members during a peaceful gathering in Manzini. As has been the case in previous attacks, the violence was brutal, senseless and indiscriminate. Hundreds of baton-wielding police charged at anyone on the street including children and the elderly. According to eyewitnesses, armed police severely assaulted an elderly woman with batons. The injuries sustained by PUDEMO and SWAYOCO activists are horrific. They range from broken bones to head injuries. Nearby offices of the Swaziland Transport and Allied Workers Union were turned into a makeshift medical centre as scores of seriously injured people required medical help ( The Times of Swaziland, 02/12/06). Several people were arrested and the beating continued at the Manzini police station. Mphandlana Shongwe, a well known pro-democracy activist, was brutally assaulted at the police station where he had gone to enquire about the arrests. Shongwe lost consciousness as his head was repeatedly banged against a wall. As a result of the beating, Shogwe suffered head injuries and a broken rib.

The scale of the violence was purely unnecessary, callous and unprovoked. The Times of Swaziland (Ibid) report claims that the police attacked after "a missile was thrown at the direction of the police… It took a single stone, thrown form the side of the marchers to the police, to trigger what appeared to have been eagerly expected by the police officers as they charged at then vigorously." The stone-throwing incident has not been corroborated by eyewitnesses and therefore we do not know if it actually occurred. However, we take a very strong view that even if something was thrown in the direction of the police, it cannot justify the scale of violence unleashed against the public. In our view, this is yet another example of unprofessional behaviour on the part of the police who act more like a gang of thugs spoiling for a fight than a professional organisation trusted with protecting the public.

What happened on Saturday is not uncommon in Swaziland. Violence is a mainstay policy of the monarchy regime in its response to calls for democracy. As has been demonstrated on numerous occasions, the regime uses violence as its ultimate response to public demands for a democratic system of governance. This is a regime which feeds on violence and fear to sustain its stranglehold on power. For many years the regime has waited for its dream of an apocalypse to come true. In recent years, it has stepped up political violence and terror against our people. The regime's strategy is to create the conditions where it can engage in mass killing and destruction of our country. It would then claim that the pro-democracy movement has provoked it to do so. For this regime, public fear is strength. At a time when the public credibility of the monarchy government has suffered massively, it hoped that mass fear would offer opportunities for political revival.

As we have always done, PUDEMO and SWAYOCO condemn this senseless act of violence against unarmed civilians. It is a poignant and cowardly act so characteristic of violent regimes. Many regimes of this type have been internationally condemned and censured, but the monarchy government in Swaziland is being encouraged by international bodies such as the Commonwealth Secretariat to commit gross human rights violations against Swazis. Public statements of support by Commonwealth senior officials such as the Secretary-General, Don MacKinnon, have given comfort to the monarchy government to violently suppress democracy with impunity. Since 1996, the Commonwealth Secretariat has refused to heed local and international concerns about its participation in the repression of our people. PUDEMO has made several representations to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Canadian members of parliament (Mr Roly MacIntyre - Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick - and Mr Paul Zed the federal representative for Saint John) have written to the Commonwealth Secretariat expressing their concerns about the situation in Swaziland.

The recent violence is directly linked to the Commonwealth-sponsored constitution which prohibits political party participation in Swaziland politics. The government used this prohibition to legalise its violence against PUDEMO and SWAYOCO. Although proponents of the constitution would argue that freedom of assembly and association is guaranteed, these freedoms do not extend to prohibited formations such as political parties. The regime thus claims constitutional legality to stamp out activity associated with political parties.

Our people were on the street on Saturday to protest against this prohibition and to honour our heroes who have died for this cause. We hold the Commonwealth responsible for the continued political violence and call upon sensible leaders within the organisation to promote democracy and peace in Swaziland and not disharmony. It is now the time for the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) to seriously consider formal investigation of the persistent violation of the Harare Declaration principles by the monarchy government. The time has also come for the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to break its silence and intervene in the crisis in Swaziland. Waiting for the apocalypse is no longer a rationale for lack of action. We invite the SADC and Commonwealth leadership to give priority to proactive rather than reactive approaches to conflict resolution. Swaziland is a member of both the Commonwealth and SADC and its persistent recalcitrance towards democracy has brought into serious question the commitment of these organisations to the principles of responsible governance. It is incumbent upon to these organisations to take the necessary action against the government of Swaziland in defence of their values and the people of Swaziland. History will judge the Commonwealth and SADC harshly if they continue to embrace the old strategy of waiting for an apocalypse.

Swaziland's persistent violation of SADC and Commonwealth values over the years presents a strong case for intervention. Once again, PUDEMO calls upon SADC and the Commonwealth to condemn the violence and take interest in our call for democratisation in Swaziland.

PUDEMO's triumph is that after twenty years of state terror, we are still marching and still committed to a relentless and non-violent struggle for democracy. We will not be suppressed and we will not be provoked into losing our way. We will continue our journey to freedom and will not be diverted from our cause by state terrorism and violence.


Signed
Dr. Jabulane Matsebula
PUDEMO Representative
Australia, Asia and the South Pacific Region

For more information contact
Kislong Shongwe
PUDEMO Deputy General Secretary
268-611-2351

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Gutter journalism and the politics of fear in Swaziland reports about a ‘secret army’

The People's United Democratic Movement of Swaziland
PUDEMO
November 29, 2006
E-mail: pudemo@yahoo.co.uk

Gutter journalism and the politics of fear in Swaziland reports about a ‘secret army’

Allegations of a PUDEMO linked secret army published by the South African newspaper, The Star (25/11/06) has fanned the fire of the politics of fear. For two days, the two daily print media in Swaziland went on a feeding frenzy in a frantic attempt to give credibility to a discredited story. For many local journalists, The Star story has been a highly prized trophy. Hence, so much effort has gone into attempts to imbue this fantasy with a sense of authority and ‘truth’.

In the absence of any current information which could lend weight to the story, one newspaper has started digging up the bones of past dictators to try to find some way to strengthen their story. The Swazi Observer (29/11/06) resurrected the late King Sobhuza II’s response to the 1977 student uprising to give weight to the story. In his speech, King Sobhuza II used his usual anxiety-provoking strategy to warn Swazis against the implications of political dissent. King Sobhuza II was a dictator fearful of political change. He skilfully employed the politics of fear to remain in power by paddling an apocalyptic (umgicomgico) scenario of multi-party democracy in Swaziland. In an attempt to establish the ‘truth’ about the ‘secret army’, The Swazi Observer (Ibid), concludes in an article titled Umgicomgico: King Sobhuza II warned of political turmoil:

It would therefore, seem like the old King, like good wine had matured with time. He made this kind of warning at the age of 77! Like a Giraffe, he saw trouble coming from a long way. Today, it would seem that the horizon is just what the King warned about. See for yourself if the King was wrong or otherwise.
The conclusion from the two-day media blitz is obvious - the attack against Swaziland by the ‘secret army’ is imminent and PUDEMO has been found guilty of planning an armed insurgency. From the early 1980s when PUDEMO publicly announced its existence to the current debate, journalists from The Swazi Observer have impatiently waited for umgicomgico. On numerous occasions, they resurrected King Sobhuza II to offer support to the apocalyptic view. From the declaration of the State of Emergency in 1973 to contemporary political discourse, myths about umgicomgico have been an important aspect of the conservative ideology. Its influence is evident in the Commonwealth-sponsored Constitution Act of 2005 which prohibits political parties. As the property of the royal family, The Swazi Observer’s commitment to keeping this ideology alive should not surprise readers.

Whilst others may see the two-day frenzy as profiteering, the reaction represents a much deeper agenda – a conspiracy to politically marginalise PUDEMO locally and internationally. By perpetrating myths about a secret army, the media campaign has aimed to deconstruct PUDEMO’s identity as a peaceful democratic movement and reconstruct it as a terrorist organisation. If successful, this would have wide ranging implications for the struggle for democracy including our relationship with South Africa. It would create space for pro-monarchy and reformist organisations to subvert Swaziland’s journey towards multi-party democracy. So far the local media has worked to raise the profile of such organisations through partisan coverage of their activities. For example, Sibahle Sinje, a conservative political movement disguised as an advocate for democratic change, enjoys unfettered access to local media. PUDEMO has no such access and the local media’s bias against PUDEMO is well known. Indeed, it has conducted a number of campaigns to discredit the organisation. The current frenzy is another attempt to ruin the reputation of PUDEMO and deprive the Swazi people of one of the few organisations in the country which has taken on the responsibility for publicly reporting and criticising human rights abuses by the regime. As we have indicated in previous publications, local journalists are not interested in what PUDEMO is but what it is not. The frenzy over the ‘secret army’ thus tells the people of Swaziland nothing about security threats but more about the partisan media identity and conspiracy against PUDEMO.

PUDEMO defends the freedom of the press but deplores gutter journalism. As an organisation with strong commitments to the principles of freedom, we stood up against the government agenda to erode freedom of the press (see for example, Freedom of Speech Attacked, 2001). We have done the same against media organisations and journalists who abuse their business and professional privileges to vilify others. On a number of occasions, we expressed our disgust against media bias and irresponsible reporting (see for example, “Sexing Up Threats to National Security…, 2006). Media organisations and journalists are governed by sets of ethical codes of conduct and they must take responsibility for the choices they make. If they chose to abandon professional and responsible business practice in preference to a witch hunt against our organisation, they must take responsibility for this choice. PUDEMO will, as it has done in the past, challenge false accusations and protect its integrity. We will also continue to speak and write freely and will not allow our powers of thought and expression to be oppressed by fear of attack. We invite the media to have the same courage.

We believe that the current media frenzy has another, even more evil purpose – the politics of fear. Where a population is made to feel afraid of imminent attack, it will more easily give up its democratic rights and give authority to a dictator to do whatever it likes. Therefore, one way of increasing and maintaining control over a population is to manufacture external threats and/or exaggerate the significance of existing threats. Dictatorial regimes then represent themselves as the protecting arm of the nation. Often people feel grateful and indebted to the regime for offering protection. They don’t notice until it is too late that in fact the only place the strength has been used is to slowly increase the regime’s stranglehold around their necks.

In Swaziland, the government has embarked upon a deliberate path of cultivating fear in order to increase its control. The people are still nervous from the “petrol bombings” of 2005/2006, but just as they were beginning to feel safer, along comes the “secret army”. As we said in our last commentary, it is significant that this has happened close to Christmas, when people expect to feel safe and celebrate. We predict that there will be wave after wave of fear-inducing stories, each tenuously linked to PUDEMO with no real details or proof ever given. If the media wanted to really contribute to the freedom of speech and thought in Swaziland, they could run a competition to see who can guess what the topic of the next fear campaign will be. Perhaps it will be “PUDEMO gunrunning financed by the axis of evil” or “PUDEMO links to North Korea”.

The media has been totally irresponsible in its approach to this issue. There is a difference between exercising public responsibility and gutter journalism. Informing the public about well-founded fears of security threats is one thing, but using a fairy tale story to instil public fear is another thing. We support the former and deplore the latter. During the feeding frenzy on The Star story, the local print media (The Swazi Observer and The Times of Swaziland) have generated unnecessary public panic and instilled fear among the Swazi population. They have abused not only their business and professional privileges but also the trust of the people of Swaziland.

We are appalled by the absence of a culture of investigative journalism in Swaziland. There is scant evidence to suggest that either of these two newspapers has tried to investigate the story beyond the The Star article to test its credibility. Instead, the coverage has been based purely on hearsay. It is mind boggling that anyone would take this story seriously. All the newspapers which have fed on this innuendo have ignored the fictitious text which is so obviously displayed in The Star article. For example, why would someone train guerrillas in primary school classrooms? The covert campaign against PUDEMO by the local media has now been truly exposed for all to see. We invite the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) to take interest in the issues we have raised in this publication.

Signed

Dr. Jabulane Matsebula
PUDEMO Representative
Australia, Asia and the South Pacific Region

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

PUDEMO Press Statement on-A Secret Army or a Fairy Tale Story?

PUDEMO Press Statement on-A Secret Army or a Fairy Tale Story?
Date: November 28, 2006

The South African-based daily newspaper, The Star (25/11/06), reported to have uncovered a PUDEMO/SWAYOCO secret guerrilla training 'camp' and plans to violently overthrow the Swazi regime. According to the report, the camp is run by the Young Communist League. This story must go down in history as one of the greatest fairy tale stories that have been told about the Swaziland liberation movement. The Swazi Observer (27/11/06), a royal family-owned daily newspaper, was the first to reproduce The Star's report in Swaziland with a high degree of sensationalism. Although The Star does not mention the military capacity of this 'guerrilla unit', The Swazi Observer calls it "the deadly unit" (Ibid).

Readers should not be surprised by this report because in the past, there have been numerous fabricated stories of armed insurrection plans linked to PUDEMO and its youth wing, the Swaziland Youth Congress (SWAYOCO). Each time, we remind our people, the international community and the media of our policy. We again take this opportunity to reiterate that our policy is to peacefully bring about political change in Swaziland. In his response to the report, the PUDEMO President, Cde Mario Masuku, unambiguously affirmed the organisation's commitment to this policy. Recently, Masuku told the Chris Hani Institute that PUDEMO believes that there is still hope for a peaceful dialogue with the regime.

Although the government has never responded to numerous calls from our organisation for a negotiated solution to the political crisis, we have not yet abandoned our policy. Unfortunately, the government has abused our commitment to peace by waging a violent witch-hunt against our membership. It has misinterpreted our non-violent resistance as an invitation for the state to use violence against us.

For more than twenty years, the regime has worked tirelessly to draw our organisation into a violent confrontation but we have maintained that we will not be drawn into such confrontation on the government's terms. Our policy priority is peace and restoration of political, social and economic harmony among our people. We are more interested in making life better for all Swazis than destroying it as this government has done for many years. This is what the regime fears – our capacity to make a difference and give Swazis a fresh start in life. The regime cannot engage with PUDEMO because it does not have the political competence to remain viable in an open democratic environment.

It is telling that the only time the government talks about PUDEMO is in relation to fairy tale stories. This time, the story is about an armed insurrection. In late 2005 and early 2006, the government peddled allegations of a PUDEMO/SWAYOCO petrol bombing campaign. The local media, particularly The Swazi Observer is guilty of giving unprecedented coverage of these slurs against our organisation. Both the government and The Swazi Observer have refused to engage with the substantive issues we continually raise about the future of this country and its people. Instead, they are concerned about protecting the political and economic privilege of the ruling royal family. The so-called training guerrilla camp is a rehashed old strategy to divert public attention away from the current corruption scandal involving senior government officials.

The timing of the report is interesting. It could herald the beginning of the treason trial against our members accused of the so-called petrol bombing campaign in December 2005. Several PUDEMO and SWAYOCO members were rounded up and accused of fire bombing government infrastructure. One of the accused was tortured to make false confession and subsequently turned into a state witness. However, he later withdrew his statement claiming that it was made under duress. This put the prosecution case at risk. The Directorate of Public Prosecution applied for an indefinite suspension of the trial whilst it searched for a new state witness and 'fresh evidence'. A year after the first arrests, our members are still awaiting trial. Could the report published in The Star be the 'smoking gun' the government is hoping to produce as evidence against our members?

Alternatively, the enthusiasm with which government officials have received The Star's story could be the beginning of another violent Christmas witch hunt against our membership. Renown for his hatred of the pro-democracy movement, the government spokesperson, Percy Simelane, warned of a massive crackdown ( The Swazi Observer, 27/11/06). In 2005, police tortured an innocent woman to death in their fanatic attempts to prove the existence of mythical PUDEMO 'petrol bombers'. As was the case in 2005, the government will use the training camp story to create unnecessary public panic and present itself as the guardian of peace in the hope that this will yield political benefits.

We have been waiting for some time for the regime to try to cash in on international fears of terrorism by trying to implicate PUDEMO in terrorist activities. Unfortunately, their attempts to do so have been characteristically incompetent. As we have mentioned, the attempt to construct a PUDEMO-led bombing campaign has been a spectacular failure. This latest attempt is also inept and should embarrass any self-respecting dictator.

Michael Schmidt, the author of The Star article, must hang his head in shame for allowing himself to be used by this evil regime. None of the people he contacted other than his so-called informant, confirmed the existence of a secret PUDEMO/SWAYOCO guerrilla army. Even the siSwati name of the 'guerrilla army' (uKukhulwa eMaswati) does not make sense – but then perhaps it is unfair of us to expect a non-Swazi to be competent in Siswati when he is writing fairy-tales. Schmidt writes that this "is an official yet underground armed wing of Pudemo…" but fails to support this with concrete evidence. Thus, the story lacks even the tiniest fragment of credibility. Michael Schmidt was a white apartheid supporter and a Communist hater fearful of the 'red plot' in the 1980s. He now hopes to use our liberation movement to mobilise the royal family in Swaziland to hunt the 'reds' under the beds. Anyone who believes in this story believes in Alice in Wonderland.


Signed
Dr. Jabulane Matsebula
PUDEMO Representative Australia, Asia and the South Pacific Region

Monday, October 30, 2006

Swaziland rewards corruption and political incompetence

PUDEMO International Office

E-mail: pudemo@yahoo.co.uk
Date: October 30, 2006

Swaziland rewards corruption and political incompetence

In a space of one week, the Swaziland government offered handsome rewards to bad practices of governance. On October 19, 2006, parliament appointed Thandi Nxumalo, an allegedly corrupt businesswoman, to the Senate. According to the Times of Swaziland – Sunday (October 22, 2006) report, the new Senator admitted swindling money from the Women United business enterprise. The story appeared again in the October 29 edition of the Times of Swaziland – Sunday with information that a formal charge has been laid against the new Senator. According to the report, Senator Nxumalo has been charged for defrauding Women United a sum of E530 974.58 (approx. US$76,000).

A week after the “election” of Nxumalo, King Mswati III promoted Constance Simelane, to the position of Deputy Prime Minister. Constance Simelane is a minister with an irrefutable record of incompetence and was moved from the Ministry of Education after widespread criticisms about the failure of leadership within the ministry. Many commentators, including the Swaziland National Association of Teachers (SNAT), have described the education system as being in crisis and in desperate need of fresh and innovative leadership. Recently, students from the University of Swaziland, William Pitcher Teacher’s College and Swaziland College of Technology abandoned classes to protest against the mismanagement of scholarship. In response to the crisis in education, particularly the mismanagement of the OVC (Orphaned and Vulnerable Children) funding scheme, SNAT called for the removal of the minister. Instead, she was promoted to the Deputy Prime Minster’s position.

It is disgraceful that King Mswati III and his Prime Minister chose to ignore public opinion. The royal family government is so drunk with power that it can’t even hear the increasingly loud voices of concerned citizens. It can’t see if it is going sideways, backwards or forwards. When the Australian Channel Nine Sixty Minutes TV crew asked King Mswati III if “the king gets too much criticism in Swaziland”, he said he didn’t know. Western audiences thought that he was avoiding the question but it is quite conceivable that he doesn’t know how much he is being criticised. Disturbingly, the King is completely insulated from criticism by the local media which refuses to publish criticisms against the monarch. In any case, he is drunk with power and has no interest in listening to the public. His absolute rule is now firmly protected by the Commonwealth-sponsored Constitution Act of 2005.

Media complacence, bias and self-censorship
Within the local media, it is established practice to apportion blame for bad governance to the cabinet in order to absolve the King from responsibility. The recent appointment of Constance Simelane has been viewed in the local media as a bad choice by the Prime Minister. Whilst it is public knowledge that the Prime Minister makes recommendations to the King about ministerial appointments, he does not have the authority to appoint or dismiss ministers. This authority rests with the King alone. The view that cabinet ministers are appointed and dismissed by the Prime Minister is misguided. It ignores the King’s absolute authority on such matters and the powerful influence of the royal inner circle which advises the King. In most cases, this advisory body is responsible for nominating and recommending individuals for cabinet positions. Simelane may have been nominated by the Prime Minister but this would have had no effect if the nomination was not blessed by the King and his advisory body. If Constance Simelane is a bad choice, she is King Mswati III’s bad choice.

It is time for the local media to be more honest and less biased in its coverage of matters relating to the governance of this country. Whilst it is understood that local journalists operate under extreme conditions of censorship, they contribute to this situation through self-censorship and political bias. There is a well-established policy in the local media to favour coverage of political views that absolve King Mswati III of responsibility for current problems. Consequently, journalists prefer to work with political organisations that have relationships with the royal family and those that pursue a reformist agenda. Voices which locate the current political malaise within the absolute monarchy system of government are denied access to the media. PUDEMO is one political organisation that calls for a broader political approach to the problems we face in this country. Like many of our public statements, it is highly likely that none of the local media will have the courage to publish this article because of its critical stance against the absolute monarchy.

As a result, Swaziland has been unable to publicly debate the extent to which the monarchy contributes to Swaziland’s problems. The monarchy is not only immune from adverse media coverage but also from public parliamentary discussion and government statements. On several occasions, the Speaker of Parliament, Charles S’gayoyo Magongo, reminded MPs not to mention the name of the King in parliamentary debates. It is not surprising that Magongo has been elevated to a cabinet post as a reward for loyalty. Where there is a God-like institution, democracy dies and blind loyalty to the ruling elite becomes an important means of political advancement. This has been the case in Swaziland since the King’s Proclamation in 1973 when the late King Sobhuza II declared himself an absolute monarch.

PUDEMO calls upon the media to engage in comprehensive debate about the political, social and economic crisis we face in this country. The freedom of the press enjoyed in other countries will not come easily without a bitter struggle and sacrifices. One of the main indicators of a free nation is the quality of media reporting including deeper analysis of social problems. As we have said in the past, any attempts to find long-term solutions to the myriad social, economic and political problems will prove inadequate unless these problems are understood in relationship to the current political system. PUDEMO regards the Absolute monarchy and its Tinkhundla system of government as a major problem. For the entire post-colonial period, the royal family has dominated the political decision-making process and is accountable to no one but itself. It is time for the local media to take this issue to the public arena. Instead of asking the Prime Minster why a minister known to be incompetent was promoted to a senior position, the media must direct this question to the appointing authority and head of state – King Mswati III.

Tinkhundla electoral system delivers corrupt senator
When the late Deputy Prime Minister, Albert Shabangu died, he left his seat in parliament and his cabinet position vacant. Under normal democratic procedures guided by the doctrine of representative parliamentary democracy, a by-election should have been held to fill the parliament seat left by the late Deputy Prime Minister. However, the electoral system in Swaziland has a conveyor belt which determines who goes into parliament and cabinet. Shabangu was also a product of this bizarre electoral system in which people are appointed rather than elected to parliament. For more than twenty years, Shabangu served as a cabinet minister but has never contested any elections. His political career depended entirely on royal appointment and favour, not the people’s vote.

One of the flaws of the current political order which PUDEMO seeks to change is the electoral system which has delivered an apparently corrupt businesswoman to parliament. The system is characterised by practices antagonistic to democratic principles. Prominent among these practices is the King’s right to appoint a certain quota of members of parliament. Similarly, the electoral system gives parliament the right to “elect” another quota from the general population. This so-called election occurs behind closed doors under strict conditions of secrecy. The social status and conservative political views of previous and serving MPs “elected” by parliament indicate heavy royal influence. The rest of the parliamentary seats are elected by popular vote on a non-party basis. Again, royal influence is actively visible here through the nomination process in which candidates are graced by chiefs who are traditional representatives of royal authority. In Swaziland, a candidate deemed a preferred choice of labadzala or royalty, has unmatched advantage to succeed in elections.

Under the current electoral system, there is no inbuilt framework of checks and balances to allow adequate investigation into the character, ability and suitability of people nominated for public office. Political campaigns, an important measure of political leadership potential, have a very limited role in Swaziland elections. Thus under the current electoral system, where only independent individuals can contest parliamentary seats, elections are policy-free zones. The system is antithetical to principles of political transparency, accountability and responsible governance and is constructed as to prevent the development of representative parliamentary democracy. As illustrated by the “election” of Thandi Nxumalo, people unfit to be law-makers and political administrators can easily pass through the enormous holes in Swaziland’s electoral system. It is no wonder that the government and the law-making body in Swaziland provide a good home for corrupt and incompetent politicians.

Entrenched culture of bad governance and deceit
These recent developments may have shocked some political observers but to the majority of Swazis they represent a familiar and deeply entrenched culture of rewarding bad behaviour. Recently, the Minister of Public Service and Information, Themba Msibi, interfered in the administration of the state television station by overturning a decision to dismiss an employee, Qhawe Mamba. Qhawe, a close friend of King Mswati III, was dismissed after allegations of theft of equipment, failure to execute his duties with diligence and insubordination. The Minister’s reason for overturning the decision was that Mamba is employed by labadzala or the royalty. This is normally an industrial issue but in Swaziland it seems that a minister can do anything as long as it is in the interests of the ruling family. The employee in question also owns a public-funded television station which is solely responsible for documenting royal events. The service provided by Mamba’s station is one of the biggest publicly-funded propaganda projects and is designed to salvage the discredited image of the monarch government.

Prime Minister, Themba Dlamini seems determined to expand the propaganda project. Recently, he announced a plan to recruit former heads of states to act as travelling agents for Swaziland (see The Swazi Observer, October 27, 2006). This plan was revealed at the same press conference in which the promotion of Constance Simelane was announced. These two announcements represent a double jeopardy scenario for the people of Swaziland. The promotion of an incompetent minister to a senior cabinet position is a severe blow to effective governance. Having been dealt a severe blow, the tax payer will now have to pay the expense of employing international spin doctors. The project is misconceived and morally repugnant. It will dig deeper into the public purse and exacerbate the country’s financial difficulties.

This money could be better spent on urgent needs such as health instead of flying out and paying exorbitant living expenses for former heads of states to spread false propaganda. It is almost certain that the recruitment will target former heads of state with outstanding records of bad governance in their own countries. Themba Dlamini wants his travelling agents to rebuild the image of the country by refuting what he calls “…negative and misleading information that is constantly being published about the kingdom” (The Swazi Observer 27, 2006). However, the Prime Minister was unable to say what information he deems misleading and negative. Is exposing social injustice and bad practices such as corruption, irresponsible spending and absence of democratic forms of governance misleading?

The government has been in bad shape for a long time now and Swaziland is a failing state. Some of the main indicators of a failing state are high levels of corruption and poverty, economic decline and financial bankruptcy, incompetent political leadership and collapsed essential services such as health. These indicators are very prominent in Swaziland with about two-thirds of the population of 1.2 million living in abject poverty whilst the royal family and a few politicians immerse themselves in wealth. There is growing consensus among political observers in Swaziland that the government is now bankrupt and is unable to fund basic public services. Public hospitals are overcrowded and have run out of basic medical supplies such as pain relief drugs and oxygen. HIV infection continues to devastate the impoverished population and there is no reprieve in sight from AIDS-related illness and death.

In his first attempt to respond to growing concerns about Swaziland’s slide into the failed state category, the Prime Minister, Themba Dlamini, “…said it was astonishing to note allegations relating to the HIV and AIDS pandemic in Swaziland. He said Swaziland had been ranked as one of the best models in the fight against HIV/AIDS” by international organisations such as UNAIDS (Swazi Times, October 24, 2006). It is important that the Prime Minister wakes up to the reality about HIV infection in Swaziland. The high rate of infection is not an allegation but has been derived from research data. According to the report published by National Emergency Response Council on HIV/AIDS (NERCHA – Swaziland) in 2006, “…the HIV problem in Swaziland is spreading at an alarming rate. In the last 12 years the HIV prevalence increased from 3.9% in 1992 to 42.6% in 2004” (p.4).

Whilst the Prime Minister was happy to announce that UNAIDS has highly ranked HIV/AIDS programs in Swaziland, he seems to be dismissing UNAIDS statistics on HIV/AIDS prevalence as allegations. There is a general agreement among international bodies working in this area that Swaziland has the highest HIV/AIDS prevalence rate in the world. As shown in the UNAIDS graph below, in the Sub-Saharan African region, Swaziland has surpassed Botswana which, in previous years, has had the highest infection rate.


clip_image003.gif
Source: UNAIDS, 2004 Report

Like his Prime Minister, King Mswati has also misled people about the effectiveness of the umcwasho (chastity) strategy in preventing the spread of HIV infection. Umcwasho is an old-age traditional practice to delay sexual activity among teenage girls. In 2001, King Mswati reintroduced umcwasho under a new ‘chastity law’ which prohibited young women under the age of 18 years from having sex for five years. Failure to conform to the ban on sex attracted heavy sanctions. Families of the offending parties, woman and men, were required to pay a cow each - a highly priced treasure in Swaziland. However, by the time the chastity period ended in 2005 the ban was largely ignored and the enthusiasm by royal authorities to impose sanctions had died away. A survey by NERCHA (2006, p.23) shows that “the proportion of young people reporting to have started engaging in sexual practice below the age of 15 was about 10%.” This figure is alarming and is perhaps much higher if the 15-18 age group is taken into consideration.

There is strongly divided opinion between HIV/AIDS activists and traditionalists whether or not the ‘chastity law’ has helped in the fight against the epidemic. When the Australian Sixty Minutes television journalist asked King Mswati III about the effectiveness of the ‘chastity law’ in fighting HIV/AIDS, he replied: “I was so happy to see that the figures of the HIV rate from their age group it decreased a lot, it helped the country very much.” The King did not back up his statement by saying which figures he was referring to, but we assume that these figures should be in the public domain somewhere. After considerable research, we were able to locate only one set of figures in the public domain which show any decline in HIV rates for that cohort and assume that these figure are the ones to which he referred.

The figures were reported in the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare HIV Ninth Sentinel Serosurveillance Report of 2004. The report shows a slight decline in HIV infection among pregnant teenagers in the 15-19 years age range from 33.5% in 2002 to 29.3% in 2004. There are no statistical analyses of the data recorded so we do not know if the change is in fact statistically significant or if it represents a chance fluctuation. These figures are not representative of the entire population of teenage girls within this age group because they represent a population of pregnant teenagers who attended Ante-Natal Clinics (ANC) and were tested for HIV infection (see Figure 1).
clip_image005.gif
In response to the report, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health and Social Welfare misled the public by claiming that these data show that “ Swaziland had turned the corner in its battle with AIDS” (IRINnews.org, August 23, 2005). Contrary to the claim by King Mswati III, these data have nothing to do with umcwasho as they are taken from pregnant teenagers who attended Ante-Natal Clinics. The fact that they were pregnant shows that they had broken the ban on sex. If the slight decrease in HIV infection rate is real and not a chance fluctuation, it might reflect changes in risk behaviours of the form promoted by other anti-HIV campaigns, such as increased monogamy. Thus, these data cannot be honestly interpreted as showing that umcwasho was successful in arresting HIV infection rates. Since its introduction in 2001, its main goal was abstinence and not changes in behaviour. Thus, these data are irrelevant to umcwasho, as they relate only to people who, by definition of their pregnancy status, have not followed umcwasho.

A systematic study of the relationship between the ‘chastity law’ and HIV prevalence is yet to be conducted. The pregnancy rate among this age cohort within the period of the sex ban would be more relevant to considering the effectiveness of umcwasho . A significant decline in pregnancy rates might indicate increased abstinence amongst this cohort of women, although it could of course indicate the increased prevalence of other forms of safer sexual practice such as condom usage. During the period of umcwasho, there were a range of other interventions such as anti-HIV/AIDS programmes organised by non-government organisations. Most of these programmes have serious reservations about the contribution of the ‘chastity law’ to the anti-HIV/AIDS campaign. Consequently, umcwasho does not feature in local and international periodic progress reports. Even NERCHA, a statutory body, does not mention umcwasho in its 2006 report. One would assume that if the chastity strategy was effective, it would have featured significantly in the NERCHA report. Instead NERCHA developed its own program (Likusasa Ngelami or The Future is Mine) to encourage young people to consider the health benefits of abstaining from sex.

Royal claims that umcwasho has been an effective intervention in the HIV epidemic just serve to illustrate the regime’s failure yet again to operate in the real world. Their response to the HIV epidemic has been grossly inadequate and now they are citing completely irrelevant data in attempts to show that their intervention was useful. Do they really believe that telling a small section of the female population to abstain from sex would have any impact on the HIV rate? This is ridiculous and in fact there are many ways in which umcwasho could have made the situation worse.

For example, umcwasho may have increased the likelihood that young males in the cohort would have become sexually active with female populations likely to be experiencing higher levels of infection, such as older women and sex workers. The graphical data in Figure 1 show that women in the older cohorts have higher infection rates and that these seem to have increased from 2002-2004, especially in the 25-29 year old and 30+ year old cohorts. Thus, even if young females obeyed umcwasho and delayed becoming sexually active, they may well have found that their male age-peers were more likely to be infected than would have been the case without umcwasho. Their risk of infection once they finished umcwasho and became sexually active with age-peer males may have thus increased. Thus, even if umcwasho managed to delay onset of sexual activity and HIV infection in that female cohort, the longer term outcome could well be higher rates of infection. Ultimately, the King might gain some benefit from having a pool of young virgins from which he chooses a new wife each year at the next reed dance ceremony, but it seems unlikely that umcwasho would help reduce Swaziland’s HIV rate.

The King’s response to the HIV epidemic is reminiscent of the story about Emperor Nero sitting in his palace playing his fiddle while Rome burnt to the ground and his people died. In Swaziland, we have an absolute monarch who sits in his palaces and plays games while people die. Then he takes credit for any positive changes in the HIV rate and completely disregards all the work done by non-government organisations who have struggled to conduct sensible HIV prevention programmes. This is rather like Nero claiming that his fiddling put the fire out and fed the people while failing to mention the emergency services.

Our people are hungry and dying whilst the royal family and politicians are dreaming of the past, stealing from the poor and spending lavishly. The Australian Sixty Minutes television documentary describes the hospital situation as “awful” and gives glimpses of royal luxury, hospital overcrowding, poverty and death. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO, 2006), the life expectancy for men and women in Swaziland is 36 and 39 years respectively.

The Sixty Minutes crew put it to King Mswati that one of the concerns in Swaziland is that he is a big spender and is running the country aground. The King denied this whilst sitting on a golden chair during the interview. He argued that his critics “…don’t know what they are talking about. They haven’t got that information…”. King Mswati is correct because the details of his family spending are a closely guarded secret. However, the lavish lifestyle displayed by the royal family is there for all to see including a fleet of ultra expensive automobiles such as a Maybach 62 and an S-Class Mercedes Pullman. When King Mswati III paid a staggering US$500,000 for the Maybach 62, he became only the third person in Africa to own this car. Royal family children go to prestigious educational institutions in the UK and USA whilst the government is unable to honour its pledge to pay fees for disadvantaged children orphaned by the high AIDS death rate.

Swazis and the international community would remember very well the US$45 million private jet scandal in 2002 when the government and Tibiyo Taka Ngwane secretly planned to steal public funds and buy King Mswati an18-seater Global Express jet. At the time, the cost of the plane was more than twice the health budget. When the information was leaked to the press, no one was willing to own up to this secret plan. However, as outrage about the purchase mounted, it transpired that a deposit of about US$4 million had already been paid. This money has never been recovered. The current Prime Minister, Themba Dlamini was the Director of Tibiyo Taka Ngwane, when the plan was hatched. Tibiyo Taka Ngwane is a multi-million corporate body held in trust for the Swazi nation by the royal family. One of its responsibilities is managing royalties paid to the country by various companies doing business in Swaziland. However, since its formation in 1968, Tibiyo Taka Ngwane has operated as a private royal family business but politicians continue to mislead the nation that this corporate body belongs to the Swazi nation.

The betrayals in Swaziland go on and on. There can now be no doubt about the corruption in this government or the extent of its contempt for its people. While international donors do their best to support ordinary Swazi citizens, the prospects of real change are slim as long as there is no adequate infrastructure to deliver services and aid with integrity. Please support the struggle for democracy in Swaziland and help put a stop to this human suffering.

Signed:

Dr. Jabulane Matsebula
PUDEMO Representative
Australia, Asia and the South Pacific Region